Page 3 of 4
Re: Pronostici - Week 4
Posted: 29/09/2012, 18:49
by sputino
NE
SF
SD
MIN
DAL
OAK
WAS
Brees (NO)
CIN-WAS
Foster (HOU)
6
4
NO
SI
Re: Pronostici - Week 4
Posted: 29/09/2012, 19:35
by Eddie#14
NE
SF
KC
DET
CHI
DEN
TB
Brady
CIN+WAS
Foster
5
3
no
si
Re: Pronostici - Week 4
Posted: 29/09/2012, 23:41
by Tican
SEZIONE 1 - PRONOSTICI (2 punti per ogni risposta esatta)
NE
SF
SD
MIN
DAL
DEN
WAS
Breese (NO)
CIN+WAS
Green-Ellis (CIN)
SEZIONE 3 - DRY ANSWER (punti indicati a fianco)
3
4
NO
SI
Re: Pronostici - Week 4
Posted: 30/09/2012, 0:17
by Peyton_Manning18
NE
SF
SD
DET
CHI
Brady (NE)
CIN+WAS
Foster (HOU)
5
2
No
Si
Re: Pronostici - Week 4
Posted: 30/09/2012, 0:59
by Paperone
NE
SF
SD
MIN
DAL
DEN
WAS
Breese
CIN+WAS
Green-Ellis
4
6
no
no
Re: Pronostici - Week 4
Posted: 30/09/2012, 2:17
by capt_yossarian
NE
SF
SD
MIN
DAL
DEN
TB
Brady
SEA+ARI
Green-Ellis (CIN)
3
4
No
Sì
Re: Pronostici - Week 4
Posted: 30/09/2012, 9:43
by 20thCenturyBoy
NE
SF
KC
DET
CHI
DEN
WAS
Brady
coppia SEA+ARI
Green-Ellis
4
2
NO
SI
Re: Pronostici - Week 4
Posted: 30/09/2012, 11:08
by gerrki
NE
SF
KC
DET
DAL
DEN
TB
Brady (NE)
SEA+ARI
Foster (HOU)
4
3
no
sì
Re: Pronostici - Week 4
Posted: 30/09/2012, 11:22
by Pailo
NE
SF
SD
MIN
DAL
DEN
WAS
Brady (NE)
CIN+WAS
Green-Ellis (CIN)
4
3
NO
SI
Re: Pronostici - Week 4
Posted: 30/09/2012, 12:31
by Panic
NE
SF
KC
DET
DAL
DEN
WAS
Breese
CIN+WAS
Foster
4
2
no
si
Re: Pronostici - Week 4
Posted: 30/09/2012, 12:39
by detroit89
NE
SF
KC
DET
CHI
DEN
WAS
Breese (NO)
SEA+ARI
Foster (HOU)
5
3
no
no
Re: Pronostici - Week 4
Posted: 30/09/2012, 12:44
by T-wolves
NE
SF
KC
MIN
CHI
DEN
WAS
Brady
CIN+WAS
Foster
4
1
no
no
Re: Pronostici - Week 4
Posted: 30/09/2012, 15:03
by defendthestar
NE
SF
SD
DET
DAL
DEN
WAS
BRADY
CIN+WAS
FOSTER
3
3
NO
NO
Re: Pronostici - Week 4
Posted: 30/09/2012, 16:25
by Ange86
NE
SF
SD
DET
CHI
DEN
WAS
Breese
CIN+WAS
Foster
SEZIONE 3 - DRY ANSWER (punti indicati a fianco)
4
3
no
si
Re: Pronostici - Week 4
Posted: 30/09/2012, 17:04
by orevacam
NE
SF
SD
DET
DAL
DEN
WAS
Breese (NO)
CIN+WAS
Foster (HOU)
5
2
NO
NO