Play.it Usa Forum

bure wrote: uh oh, look who's talking about crying and moaning, lol.

speaking of Thomas, i'll enjoy Boston starter at 4.1M.. good luck finding another G!

Whoop me...I'm crying and moaning? what??? I just said that you're a STUPID ASSHOLE, Chucklehead

and don't butch for my G situation...i will make my choices

Stick it!

ah, dimmi quando hai finito di fare il coglione e rilanciare a caso ogni mia offerta...almeno evito di perdere tempo

Another peaceful day.

I love it more and more.

..e così Monterey e LA si sono scambiati i portieri  :gazza:
facile immaginare qualche bieco accordo dietro le quinte... :loophole:

scusate, ma come mai Playit è cambiato?
Così fa cagare e non si capisce nulla...

bure wrote: ..e così Monterey e LA si sono scambiati i portieri  :gazza:
facile immaginare qualche bieco accordo dietro le quinte... :loophole:

Questo lo dici tu...

ilya wrote: scusate, ma come mai Playit è cambiato?
Così fa cagare e non si capisce nulla...

Vero, è proprio uno schifo e non si capisce un cazzo.

The Anzer wrote: Questo lo dici tu...

Vedi di non cominciare a venire meno agli accordi presi...  :gazza:

next year there HAS to be a max bid or something of that sort introduced

way too many pricks here bidding 80000 times on one guy

and detroit can fuck right off

TheDominator wrote: next year there HAS to be a max bid or something of that sort introduced

way too many pricks here bidding 80000 times on one guy

Did you catch this post Claude Giroux? I agree with you Dom. Having these bids go on and on forever because of a select few guys here is a big waste of my time. Bids shouldn't be done for shits and giggles. It should be done because you really want the guy and are willing to make a significant sacrifice to get him. A max bid count would make that happen.

Sure did. I don't know what would be better for the game though. Free Agency is what it is and I suspect this is the only period of the season in which you have to plan things and be very active, if you somehow reduce this what happens to the game? I mean, what else interesting is left? Laughable trade offers? The draft? (probably 90% of managers do that after reading on the internet someone else mock draft anyway...).

One way out, if we need any, might be to raise the starting bids values, or to increase the raise values. 0.2m for a raise is a pretty weak value probably.

But still this makes sense only if plenty of managers are unhappy, as of today I can see only two...12% or something, thats not much.

Btw, let me come up with an example you will love... :lol2:

Lets say we set a limit of 50 offers in Free Agency, you bid 50 players, and after 2 minutes I overbid your 50 players, so the result is you get nothing out of free agency. How do you love that bids limit then? :figo:

seriously speaking, i don't get what all this whining is about.

maybe you guys feel you're the only ones entitled to place multiple biddings on a player once you were the first to bid for him?  :lmao:

If you don't feel like having to bid multiple times to get a player you can still place right away your best offer once and for all.

If instead, understandably, you don't want to do so, why other GMs should then?
they have every right to place multiple bids on your player as much as you are doing, cause guess what, that's not your player until you sign him.

Is it just me or stanleit.com is down from a few hours?
Nice timing...