ilya wrote:
scusate, ma come mai Playit è cambiato?
Così fa cagare e non si capisce nulla...
Vero, è proprio uno schifo e non si capisce un cazzo.
Yes, he had been elbowed in the head but a retaliatory slash hard enough to break a bone is a bit much. - Yahoo Fantasy riguardo al Profeta Ohlund (sospeso per 4 partite)
Vedi di non cominciare a venire meno agli accordi presi... :gazza:
Yes, he had been elbowed in the head but a retaliatory slash hard enough to break a bone is a bit much. - Yahoo Fantasy riguardo al Profeta Ohlund (sospeso per 4 partite)
TheDominator wrote:
next year there HAS to be a max bid or something of that sort introduced
way too many pricks here bidding 80000 times on one guy
Did you catch this post Claude Giroux? I agree with you Dom. Having these bids go on and on forever because of a select few guys here is a big waste of my time. Bids shouldn't be done for shits and giggles. It should be done because you really want the guy and are willing to make a significant sacrifice to get him. A max bid count would make that happen.
2010 Yahoo! H2H Champion and 2010 Stanleit Western Conference Champion
Sure did. I don't know what would be better for the game though. Free Agency is what it is and I suspect this is the only period of the season in which you have to plan things and be very active, if you somehow reduce this what happens to the game? I mean, what else interesting is left? Laughable trade offers? The draft? (probably 90% of managers do that after reading on the internet someone else mock draft anyway...).
One way out, if we need any, might be to raise the starting bids values, or to increase the raise values. 0.2m for a raise is a pretty weak value probably.
But still this makes sense only if plenty of managers are unhappy, as of today I can see only two...12% or something, thats not much.
Btw, let me come up with an example you will love... :lol2:
Lets say we set a limit of 50 offers in Free Agency, you bid 50 players, and after 2 minutes I overbid your 50 players, so the result is you get nothing out of free agency. How do you love that bids limit then? :figo:
seriously speaking, i don't get what all this whining is about.
maybe you guys feel you're the only ones entitled to place multiple biddings on a player once you were the first to bid for him? :lmao:
If you don't feel like having to bid multiple times to get a player you can still place right away your best offer once and for all.
If instead, understandably, you don't want to do so, why other GMs should then?
they have every right to place multiple bids on your player as much as you are doing, cause guess what, that's not your player until you sign him.
Last edited by bure on 13/09/2010, 21:56, edited 1 time in total.
New York Batteries, the 2009 and 2010 and 2011 (and only) Stanleit Cup Champions.
[/align]