superjoe2001 wrote:
All I remember was that I was screwed out of having Bergeron on the IR for a week. But, that's not the point. You said you did not want to set a precedent. But, you clearly have set a precedent now for holding up a trade because of a player's health. To me, it sounds like you are questioning Sanna's intelligence. I think he's fully aware of DiPietro's uncertain health status. We both recognized that in our discussions. This new trade isn't kindergarden shit. It was meant to appease the panel a bit more to allow for the trade to go through. But, sincerely, congrats on setting a new precedence. Even though you said you wanted to avoid doing something like that at all costs. As far as I'm concerned, that change in position is kindergarden shit.
Last time I checked, I was still entitled to have an opinion.
In Bergeron's case, my opinion wasn't asked, I just followed the rulebook. 3 or whatever other mods could have come in your aid if i did anything wrong just like they've done in the past.
In this case, I was asked to express my opinion by the two other players that protested the trade and by the ones who voted me as part of the trade committee.
Get the difference?
All I meant was that news eventually will come out, as it did in Bergeron's case.