Re: [Stanleit] Trade Commission

Snipeshow · Post by **Snipeshow** » 01/07/2010, 3:33

Alright well whatever you want.

Reverse the trades, keep the trades. With RFA I get them for 2 and 3 years if I want. My 2011 RFAs aren't great, so I can use them on this.

I guess we will see who gets picked with my picks and see what happens...

Mazziero · Post by **Mazziero** » 01/07/2010, 8:21

bure wrote: Bottom line, the message i hope everyone will get from all of this:
don't act in a hurry just cause you have to leave, as throwing away assets won't only hurt your team, it will unfairly benefit the lucky recipient on the other side.

I agree with this statement, in the dinasty resources are limited and also if now you can think that those picks were not usefull for you, those picks could be usefull going on the dinasty, for example Snipeshow could have traded those to get some more picks on next years to use it in trades during the season, so @ Snipe, don't waste resources for your team.
In my opinion, the most important thing is that the trade commission is not a nanny for any team, trade commission should block trade dangerous for the dinasty, and I don't think that 4 3rd round picks, a FA player and a defensive defenceman are so dangerous for the dinasty.

TheDominator · Post by **TheDominator** » 01/07/2010, 8:32

fiduciosamente il mio italiano non sembra come la merda

In ogni modo, dunque nessuno pensa altro che è giusto che ho dovuto commerciare primo globale per prendere più scelte di abbozzo e degli altri inizi di individuo con un camion pieno di scelte di abbozzo e commercia tutti loro lontano per pressoché niente?

giusto la mia opinione

therussianrocket · Post by **therussianrocket** » 01/07/2010, 9:19

TheDominator wrote: fiduciosamente il mio italiano non sembra come la merda

In ogni modo, dunque nessuno pensa altro che è giusto che ho dovuto commerciare primo globale per prendere più scelte di abbozzo e degli altri inizi di individuo con un camion pieno di scelte di abbozzo e commercia tutti loro lontano per pressoché niente?

giusto la mia opinione

Vicram · Post by **Vicram** » 01/07/2010, 9:43

Troppo inglese per i miei gusti...urge ripasso. :gazza:

Hobbit83 · Post by **Hobbit83** » 01/07/2010, 9:46

bure wrote: And as this vote shows, the trade commission doesn't always agree with me, and I can't accept it...

Now the quote is correct. :truzzo:

A pair of other considerations:
1. Alzner, for what we can see now, is a fanta-millstone on his owner's neck. Even if he would get helium the next year, at present he is a less-than-100-fantapoints-in-2-years guy with only one year of contract (so few time to improve and became useful) at 2.3 million!
2. What is the value of a 3rd round pick? Sometimes they have no value, sometimes it appears like "nobody can survive without a 3rd round pick".
When I trade for Lecavalier, the 3rd round pick was not considered by you experts in the value involved...
In the previous days, I got some offer about my 3rd round pick. For a mid-round 3rd pick people offered me only RFA-rights on people taken at the minimum salary the last year or overpayed.
And now, in these trade a 3rd round appears like the Solomon's gold mines!

Try to figure out how much is the value of a 3rd round pick, and then make me know what you have decided....
(btw, "you" here is not referred to bure... It is plural)

TheDominator wrote: fiduciosamente il mio italiano non sembra come la merda

In ogni modo, dunque nessuno pensa altro che è giusto che ho dovuto commerciare primo globale per prendere più scelte di abbozzo e degli altri inizi di individuo con un camion pieno di scelte di abbozzo e commercia tutti loro lontano per pressoché niente?

giusto la mia opinione

Noooooooo Google translator nooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :stralol:

TheDominator · Post by **TheDominator** » 01/07/2010, 9:48

l'hahah l'ho saputo, che non ha fatto probabilmente un pezzetto di senso

bure · Post by **bure** » 01/07/2010, 14:46

TheDominator wrote: fiduciosamente il mio italiano non sembra come la merda

In ogni modo, dunque nessuno pensa altro che è giusto che ho dovuto commerciare primo globale per prendere più scelte di abbozzo e degli altri inizi di individuo con un camion pieno di scelte di abbozzo e commercia tutti loro lontano per pressoché niente?

giusto la mia opinione

OMG, this is awesome lol.

let me guess:
ho dovuto commerciare primo globale = had to trade the 1st overall
per prendere più scelte di abbozzo = to get more draft picks (1 more, n.d.r.)
e degli altri inizi di individuo con un camion pieno di scelte di abbozzo e commercia tutti loro lontano per pressoché niente? =
whereas some newcomer traded away a bunch of draft picks basically for nothing?

so.. i guess you were complaining as well about last Snipe's deals? :D

bure · Post by **bure** » 01/07/2010, 14:56

Mazziero wrote: In my opinion, the most important thing is that the trade commission is not a nanny for any team, trade commission should block trade dangerous for the dinasty, and I don't think that 4 3rd round picks, a FA player and a defensive defenceman are so dangerous for the dinasty.

so the trade Commission just changed its habits and this will be the new standard?

Last time i checked it was about unbalanced deals..

i'm just trying to get some kind of a 'standard' for the future at least.

This "dangerous for the league" thing is a much less strict policy than what we have been used to in the past..
what should we consider dangerous for the league?
it's gonna be hard rejecting trades accordingly with that unspecific definition.

Hobbit83 · Post by **Hobbit83** » 01/07/2010, 16:22

bure wrote: so the trade Commission just changed its habits and this will be the new standard?

No. This is the opinion of Mazziero about the role of the commission:

Mazziero wrote: In my opinion, the most important thing is that the trade commission is not a nanny for any team, trade commission should block trade dangerous for the dinasty, and I don't think that 4 3rd round picks, a FA player and a defensive defenceman are so dangerous for the dinasty.

but the Commission have seen the trades not enough umbalanced to put the veto on them. I have already explained my POV on the assets involved in the trades.

TheDominator · Post by **TheDominator** » 01/07/2010, 17:25

bure wrote: OMG, this is awesome lol.

let me guess:
ho dovuto commerciare primo globale = had to trade the 1st overall
per prendere più scelte di abbozzo = to get more draft picks (1 more, n.d.r.)
e degli altri inizi di individuo con un camion pieno di scelte di abbozzo e commercia tutti loro lontano per pressoché niente? =
whereas some newcomer traded away a bunch of draft picks basically for nothing?

so.. i guess you were complaining as well about last Snipe's deals?

:notworthy: :lol2:

you got it.

i thought it would be easier for me to stick with the eastern team, if i new the western team situation the choice would of been obvious.

but what's done is done, i'm still happy with my team

Hobbit83 · Post by **Hobbit83** » 01/07/2010, 17:54

That is not a TT thread!!!!!!

^Tex^ · Post by **^Tex^** » 11/07/2010, 18:14

I protest the Price trade.

Denver just sold one highly touted prospect (1st round pick,also) and a 3rd round for a overrated goalie with only one year left in his contract (and a huge salary), with better goalies available both RFAs/UFAs.
Just for example a 1st rounder and a 3rd rounder will be the compensation in case of an offer sheet 6.2M/3years to Niemi...not exactly the same situation.

bure · Post by **bure** » 11/07/2010, 18:43

^Tex^ wrote: Just for example a 1st rounder and a 3rd rounder will be the compensation in case of an offer sheet 6.2M/3years to Niemi...not exactly the same situation.

and?

like the package Jassi will be able to get back next year making Price a RFA? :gazza:

Biron 43 · Post by **Biron 43** » 11/07/2010, 18:46

protesto pure io :D